<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: De Beers Class Action Lawsuit</title>
	<link>http://blog.imagesjewelers.com/diamonds/de-beers-class-action-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>different from the rest</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.imagesjewelers.com/diamonds/de-beers-class-action-lawsuit/#comment-54</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.imagesjewelers.com/diamonds/de-beers-class-action-lawsuit/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I wanted to follow up on this post of Shawn's. 

I see a massive loophole in the settlement for the lawyers and DeBeers. There is a $10 minimum payout. If your share does not equal at least $10, you will not get a check at all. So it's in DeBeers best interest to have as many people as possible apply for their fair share of the cut.

I wonder how many people will fall in the $9 range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to follow up on this post of Shawn&#8217;s. </p>
<p>I see a massive loophole in the settlement for the lawyers and DeBeers. There is a $10 minimum payout. If your share does not equal at least $10, you will not get a check at all. So it&#8217;s in DeBeers best interest to have as many people as possible apply for their fair share of the cut.</p>
<p>I wonder how many people will fall in the $9 range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
